<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ravica Blog &#187; NetFlow probes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/category/netflow-probes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ravica.com/blog</link>
	<description>Environmental monitoring solutions that just work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>softflowd : Free NetFlow Probe</title>
		<link>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/softflowd-free-netflow-probe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/softflowd-free-netflow-probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NetFlow probes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetFlow analyzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflow monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflow probe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravica.com/blog/?p=2440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We tested a free netflow probe recently called softflowd.  The setup and configuration was pretty straight forward. To install softflowd: sudo apt-get install libpcap-dev sudo apt-get install softflowd After softflowd is installed you can run it on an interface. In the example below eth0 is attached to a mirrored port (uplink) on a core switch and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We tested a free netflow probe recently called <a title="Free NetFlow probe" href="http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/maverick/man8/softflowd.8.html" target="_blank">softflowd</a>.  The setup and configuration was pretty straight forward. To install softflowd:</p>
<ul>
<li>sudo apt-get install libpcap-dev</li>
<li>sudo apt-get install softflowd</li>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-2440"></span></p>
<p>After softflowd is installed you can run it on an interface. In the example below eth0 is attached to a mirrored port (uplink) on a core switch and the NetFlow is being sent to 10.1.10.1 on UDP 2055. This will allow you to see all of the flows on the switch.</p>
<ul>
<li>sudo softflowd –v 9 –n10.1.10.1:2055 –i eth0 –m 100000 –t general=60s</li>
</ul>
<p>Use a free <a title="Free NetFlow Reporting tool" href="http://www.plixer.com/products/netflow-sflow/scrutinizer-netflow-sflow.php" target="_blank">NetFlow monitoring</a> tool such as Scrutinizer.  Scrutinizer NetFlow Analyzer will treat this as a new exporter, but will only report using a single interface, 0. All of the flows are tagged with a source interface of 0 and a destination interface of 0.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/softflowd-free-netflow-probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Monitoring System</title>
		<link>http://www.ravica.com/blog/security-monitoring/security-monitoring-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ravica.com/blog/security-monitoring/security-monitoring-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 01:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NetFlow probes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humidity sensors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night vision cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security monitoring system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature sensors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravica.com/blog/?p=2383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our new security monitoring system is underway and I should have some pics and some specs on what we have installed. We have multiple security cameras attached to the security probe as well as some temperature sensors and humidity sensors. Nationally, the USA is not seeing a big increase in crime, however this is best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our new security monitoring system is underway and I should have some pics and some specs on what we have installed. We have multiple security cameras attached to the <a title="video surveillance system" href="http://www.ravica.com/products/index.php" target="_blank">security probe</a> as well as some temperature sensors and humidity sensors.</p>
<p><span id="more-2383"></span></p>
<p>Nationally, the USA is not seeing a big increase in crime, however this is best measured locally according to the <a title="Justice Bureau" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States" target="_blank">Bureau of Justice</a>.  Is crime on the increase in your area?</p>
<p>What is interesting about this solution is that it doesn&#8217;t involve multiple monitor spread out over a wall with 1-2 people watching for problems (or sleeping).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/securityCameraMonitoring.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2384" title="security Camera Monitoring" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/securityCameraMonitoring.jpg" alt="security camera console" width="279" height="185" /></a></p>
<p>Our solution is a dashboard that allows you to have cameras from different vendors in the same web interface.  You can place a gadget using any 3rd party URL into the mashup. I should be able to put some <a title="nBox NetFlow probe" href="http://www.ravica.com/products/netflow-probe/nbox.php" target="_blank">NetFlow probes</a>  in here as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/securityEventCenter.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2385" title="security Event Center" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/securityEventCenter-300x230.jpg" alt="security consule mashup" width="300" height="230" /></a></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to start testing the playback features:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/securityCameraPlayback.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2386" title="security Camera Playback" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/securityCameraPlayback-116x300.jpg" alt="record video and playback during motion" width="116" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>I should be able to post some details over the coming months.  I&#8217;ll even have some night vision cameras with inferred technology to tinker with.  I can&#8217;t wait!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ravica.com/blog/security-monitoring/security-monitoring-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DSCP or ToS in Flexible NetFlow Configurations</title>
		<link>http://www.ravica.com/blog/general/dscp-or-tos-in-flexible-netflow-configurations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ravica.com/blog/general/dscp-or-tos-in-flexible-netflow-configurations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt St Jean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environmental monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPFIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetFlow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetFlow probes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco nbar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco performance monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexible netflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexible netflow export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fliexible netflow reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipdiffservcodepoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflow developments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravica.com/blog/?p=2303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you want to export ToS or DSCP in your Flexible NetFlow export? This is an interesting question and I&#8217;ll do my best to answer it. The NetFlow RFC 3954  makes reference to ToS as the 5th field and makes NO reference to DSCP. The IPFIX standard information elements outlined in RFC 5102 lists both [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you want to export ToS or DSCP in your Flexible NetFlow export? This is an interesting question and I&#8217;ll do my best to answer it. The <a title="NetFlow RFC 3954" href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3954.txt" target="_blank">NetFlow RFC 3954</a>  makes reference to ToS as the 5th field and makes NO reference to DSCP. The IPFIX standard <a title="IPFIX Standard Information Elements" href="http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml" target="_blank">information elements</a> outlined in RFC 5102 lists both ToS (5) and ipDiffServCodePoint (195). Why duplicate efforts, aren&#8217;t they the same thing? <strong>NO!</strong></p>
<p><strong>Why have Both?</strong><br />
ToS is an 8 bit field that includes DSCP which is a 6 bit field. This being said, I could not find a Flexible NetFlow document that would make reference to both however, I know Cisco sometimes supports both in the same export.</p>
<p>Be aware that Cisco NetFlow v5 and traditional NetFlow v9 only export ToS. I&#8217;m sure you are aware that FnF is an extension of NetFlow v9 and supports both ToS and / or DSCP depending on the implementation.</p>
<p>* Cisco NBAR (requires FnF) for example, it will export both ToS = ipClassOfService (5) and DSCP ipDiffServCodePoint (195). See below.</p>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter" style="text-align: center;">
<dl id="" class="wp-caption   aligncenter" style="width: 304px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img title="Tos and Dscp" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/netflowBothTosAndDscp.png" alt="NetFlow Both Tos and Dscp" width="294" height="226" /></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">Cisco nBar Exports ToS &amp; DSCP</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p><span id="more-2303"></span>* Cisco Performance Monitoring for Medianets (requires FnF) for example, it only allows for the export of DSCP ipDiffServCodePoint (195).<br />
* The <a title="Youtube nBox" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UO1P98Ls0iA" target="_blank">nBox </a>exports ToS (5) even when exporting IPFIX however, it may export DSCP (195). I need to check.</p>
<p><strong>Why did this Happen?</strong></p>
<p>Cisco is a big company. <img src='http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  My guess is that communication doesn&#8217;t always occur on every field that an engineer wants to export. Lets hope it is easy for them to address. In the mean time, what can you do?</p>
<p>Look for a <a title="Scrutinizer NetFlow &amp; sFlow Analyzer" href="http://www.plixer.com/products/netflow-sflow/scrutinizer-netflow-sflow.php" target="_blank">Flexible NetFlow Reporting</a>  solution that supports reporting on either but, you need to be using our beta release. See below.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Tos or DSCP" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/netflowTosOrDscp.png" alt="TOS or DSCP" width="454" height="367" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Join <a title="LinkedIn- NetFlow Developments" href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups/NetFlow-Developments-3890849" target="_blank">NetFlow Developments</a> on Linkedin to stay on top of issues like this.</p>
-------------------------------------
</p>
Matthew St Jean
</p>
<a title="Follow us on Twitter!" href="http://twitter.com/#!/RavicaMonitors">Twitter</a>
</p>
<a title=""Like" us on Facebook!" href="https://www.facebook.com/pages/Network-Traffic-Environmental-Monitoring-Solutions/127217813987612?sk=wall">Facebook</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ravica.com/blog/general/dscp-or-tos-in-flexible-netflow-configurations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latency Measuring with nBox and NetFlow</title>
		<link>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/latency-measuring-with-nbox-and-netflow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/latency-measuring-with-nbox-and-netflow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 14:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Mills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[nBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetFlow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetFlow probes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[client delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud service monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monitoring cloud services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetFlow reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nProbe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nTop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plixer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravica.com/blog/?p=2053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Cisco’s NetFlow technology can be extremely helpful in identifying top talkers and applications on the network, it can sometimes lack the fine details often found in a standard packet capture. For instance, let’s take a look at application responsiveness. To determine why an application is slow to respond we often look to the amount [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/images.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2058 alignleft" title="network slowness" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/images.jpg" alt="determining network slowness" width="101" height="101" /></a>While Cisco’s NetFlow technology can be extremely helpful in identifying top talkers and applications on the network, it can sometimes lack the fine details often found in a standard packet capture. For instance, let’s take a look at application responsiveness. To determine why an application is slow to respond we often look to the amount of traffic on the link, as well as the latency of the transaction itself. Was there congestion in the pipe? Was the end-system slow to respond? Was the application itself responsible for the sluggishness? These are certainly all possibilities.</p>
<p>Luckily for the rest of us, the <a title="nBox latency monitoring" href="http://www.ravica.com/products/netflow-probe/nbox.php">NetFlow data</a> that gets exported from the nBox is a little bit different. In addition to what NetFlow normally provides in network traffic details, nBox exports include email addresses, HTTP URLs, Latency, VoIP Jitter and more. There is one caveat; at this time, Scrutinizer NetFlow &amp; sFlow Analyzer is the only <a title="netflow traffic analysis" href="http://www.plixer.com/products/netflow-sflow/scrutinizer-netflow-sflow.php">NetFlow reporting tool</a> that can properly display these extra data fields. So you will want to make sure to look into Plixer’s product offering to take advantage of these advanced features.</p>
<p><span id="more-2053"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/nBox-latency.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2054 aligncenter" title="nBox latency" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/nBox-latency.jpg" alt="NetFlow latency reporting" width="480" height="322" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/nBox-latency.jpg"></a>Michael Patterson of Plixer International and Luca Deri of nTop.org have devised an excellent whitepaper describing, in detail, the methods behind <a title="Determining Latency with NetFlow Whitepaper" href="http://www.plixer.com/support/wp_request.php?w11=Yes">determining network latency using NetFlow</a> from your nBox.</p>
<p>So, whether your slowness issues are caused by Application Latency, Client Delay or Server Delay, the combination of Scrutinizer and nBox can be a valuable suite for network administrators that need the extra visibility into application and network performance. In addition, these details can also be quite helpful when monitoring cloud services. Just ask any marketing or sales rep how frustrating it can be when their connection to Salesforce.com is crawling right along. Why waste hours troubleshooting a network issue that isn’t an issue with the network? Conversely, why should an application be blamed when it’s clearly database transactions are being poorly routed?</p>
<p>Let us know if you’ve had success with using nBox data to pinpoint slowdowns. We’d love to hear your stories!</p>
<p>~ Jon Mills<br />
<a title="Follow Jon Mills on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/MyFakeID">Follow Me On Twitter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/latency-measuring-with-nbox-and-netflow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VoIP NetFlow Monitoring Software</title>
		<link>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/voip-netflow-monitoring-software/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/voip-netflow-monitoring-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[nBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetFlow probes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco netflow analyzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nProbe demo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voip monitoring software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP NetFlow Monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravica.com/blog/?p=2014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you looking for VoIP monitoring software using NetFlow? Many people wouldn&#8217;t consider a Cisco NetFlow analyzer for troubleshooting voice or video traffic; however, this is changing. Cisco, SonicWALL and nProbe are all providing details that allow for VoIP NetFlow Monitoring. VoIP Details include: SSRC Codec Jitter Packet Loss Caller ID Details on both RTP [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you looking for VoIP monitoring software using NetFlow?  Many people wouldn&#8217;t consider a <a title="NetFlow analyzer for Cisco routers" href="http://www.plixer.com/search/cisco-netflow-analyzer.php">Cisco NetFlow analyzer</a> for troubleshooting voice or video traffic; however, this is changing. Cisco, SonicWALL and <a title="NetFlow Probe" href="http://www.ravica.com/products/netflow-probe/index.php">nProbe</a> are all providing details that allow for VoIP NetFlow Monitoring.</p>
<p>VoIP Details include:</p>
<ul>
<li>SSRC</li>
<li>Codec</li>
<li>Jitter</li>
<li>Packet Loss</li>
<li>Caller ID</li>
<li>Details on both RTP and SIP</li>
</ul>
<p>Below are a few screen shots of these new reports, which are based on the nProbe&#8217;s IPFIX exports. IPFIX is the proposed standard for NetFlow.</p>
<p><span id="more-2014"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/nProbeVoipSipAndRtpVolume.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2015" title="nProbe VoIP, SIP And RTP volume" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/nProbeVoipSipAndRtpVolume.png" alt="" width="466" height="346" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/nProbeVoipSipAndRtpLatency.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2016" title="nProbe VoIP, SIP and RTP latency" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/nProbeVoipSipAndRtpLatency.png" alt="" width="468" height="331" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/nProbeVoipJitterSsrc.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2017" title="nProbe VoIP, Jitter and SSRC" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/nProbeVoipJitterSsrc.png" alt="" width="467" height="335" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/nProbeVoipCallerId.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2018" title="nProbe VoIP Caller ID" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/nProbeVoipCallerId.png" alt="" width="468" height="337" /></a></p>
<p>If you are looking for an nProbe demo, give us a call. We can provide many of the above details on your <a title="Cisco Performance Monitoring" href="http://www.cisco.com/go/medianet">Cisco medianet</a>, as well using their new Performance Monitoring NetFlow exports.</p>
<p>~ Mike Allen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/voip-netflow-monitoring-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IPFIX specification passed by nProbe software</title>
		<link>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/ipfix-specification-passed-by-nprobe-software/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/ipfix-specification-passed-by-nprobe-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Mills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[nBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetFlow probes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEMONS IPFIX Interoperability Event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPFIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPFIX probe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luca Deri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflow probe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetFlow-Lite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nProbe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravica.com/blog/?p=2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just last week,  DEMONS, a European project designed for addressing the largest obstacles of &#8220;cooperative network monitoring,&#8221; held a successful IPFIX Interoperability Event in Prague. It was at this event that the nProbe software, available here at Ravica.com, was certified as compliant with the IPFIX verification testing. nProbe creator, Luca Deri, says in a recent blog post, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just last week,  DEMONS, a European project designed for addressing the largest obstacles of &#8220;cooperative network monitoring,&#8221; held a successful <a title="DEMONS IPFIX Interop: Report" href="http://fp7-demons.eu/?p=245">IPFIX Interoperability Event</a> in Prague. It was at this event that the <a title="NetFlow v5/v9 Probe" href="http://www.ravica.com/products/netflow-probe/nprobe.php">nProbe software</a>, available here at Ravica.com, was certified as compliant with the IPFIX verification testing.</p>
<p><span id="more-2010"></span></p>
<p>nProbe creator, <a title="nProbe complies with IPFIX specification" href="http://www.ntop.org/blog/?p=363">Luca Deri</a>, says in a recent blog post, &#8220;nProbe 6.3.x has been successfully tested against all the available implementations including Vermont, SiLK, nfdump/IPFIX (Cesnet). nProbe has passed all the IPFIX interoperability tests as both probe (over SCTP, UDP, and TCP) and collector (UDP), dissecting both IPv4 and IPv6 traffic, and also converting NetFlow-Lite flows into IPFIX flows.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ipfix-interop-300x214.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2011" title="IPFIX interop" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ipfix-interop-300x214.jpg" alt="Luca Deri at ipfix interoperability event" width="300" height="214" /></a></p>
<p>Above is a picture of Luca at the event. That&#8217;s him just right from the middle, between Benoit Claise from Cisco (a joint creator of NetFlow / <a title="IP Flow Information Export" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_Flow_Information_Export">IPFIX</a>) and Jiri Novotni of Invea-Tech.</p>
<p>This news speaks volumes about the level of commitment that Luca and the rest of the nProbe team have made to complying with the various network performance monitoring standards in the industry.</p>
<p>Jon Mills<br />
<a title="follow Jon Mills on twitter" href="http://twitter.com/myfakeid">Follow Me On Twitter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/ipfix-specification-passed-by-nprobe-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NetFlow-Lite (NFlite) Exports Using the nProbe and a NetFlow Collector</title>
		<link>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/netflow-lite-nflite-exports-using-the-nprobe-and-a-netflow-collector/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/netflow-lite-nflite-exports-using-the-nprobe-and-a-netflow-collector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[nBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetFlow probes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nProbe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravica.com/blog/?p=1893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This month’s Cisco Live show in London allowed for some great opportunities.  We mentioned that we met up with Luca Deri, developer of the nProbe.  Our friends at Plixer International also attended the show where Cisco demonstrated the abilities of their new Catalyst 4948E NetFlow-Lite (NFlite) exports using Plixer&#8217;s Scrutinizer NetFlow Analyzer with the nProbe.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This month’s Cisco Live show in London allowed for some great opportunities.  We mentioned that we met up with Luca Deri, developer of the nProbe.  Our friends at Plixer International also attended the show where Cisco demonstrated the abilities of their new Catalyst 4948E NetFlow-Lite (NFlite) exports using Plixer&#8217;s Scrutinizer NetFlow Analyzer with the nProbe.  NFlite is a sampling technology using NetFlow v9.</p>
<p>Plixer’s Product Manager, Michael Patterson, recently blogged about its features, explaining how the NFlite samples are sent to the nProbe, sending one sample per NetFlow datagram.  He also included a screen capture of their Scrutinizer <a title="Scrutinizer NetFlow and sFlow Analyzer" href="http://www.plixer.com/products/netflow-sflow/scrutinizer-netflow-sflow.php" target="_blank">NetFlow collector</a> demonstrating the integrated view of NetFlow data from N7k and NetFlow-lite from the 4948E.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ciscoCatalyst4948EandCiscoNexus7000.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1895" title="Cisco Catalyst 4948E and Cisco Nexus 7000" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/ciscoCatalyst4948EandCiscoNexus7000.png" alt="NetFlow-lite reporting" width="482" height="119" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-1893"></span>Plixer was able to work directly with Cisco and with Luca Deri to ensure Scrutinizer’s compatibility with the <a title="Cisco Catalyst 4948E NetFlow-Lite Exports" href="http://www.plixer.com/blog/netflow/catalyst-4948e-netflow-lite-exports/" target="_blank">new NetFlow exports</a>.  Ravica offers nProbe as a versatile and powerful software solution to help you retrieve these NetFlow exports.  When installed on a PC, nProbe turns it into a Network-aware monitoring appliance.</p>
<p>Ravica offers nProbe as part of the <a title="an embedded NetFlow probe" href="http://www.ravica.com/products/netflow-probe/nbox.php" target="_blank">nBox </a>hardware solution to help you monitor your network.  nBox is an economical solution which is easily implemented.</p>
<p>If you would like more information about monitoring your network traffic with an nBox, give us a call.</p>
<p>~Angela<br />
207-324-8173<br />
<a title="Follow Ravica on Twitter!" href="http://twitter.com/RavicaMonitors" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter!</a><br />
<a title="Find us on Facebook!" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#%21/pages/Ravica/127217813987612" target="_blank">Find us on Facebook!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/netflow-lite-nflite-exports-using-the-nprobe-and-a-netflow-collector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Live- London with nProbe Developer Luca Deri</title>
		<link>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/cisco-live-london-with-nprobe-developer-luca-deri/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/cisco-live-london-with-nprobe-developer-luca-deri/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[nBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetFlow probes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipfix collector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflow appliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflow probe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nProbe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravica.com/blog/?p=1860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to Cisco Live Europe 2011 recently and met up with Luca Deri, the developer of the nProbe (a.k.a. NetFlow Probe).  It was great to finally meet this industry icon for NetFlow and IPFIX.  I just had to have my picture taken with him.  Luca is on the right in the photo below: Luca [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to <a title="Cisco Systems' tradeshow in London" href="http://www.ciscolive.com" target="_blank">Cisco Live</a> Europe 2011 recently and met up with Luca Deri, the developer of the nProbe (a.k.a. NetFlow Probe).  It was great to finally meet this industry icon for NetFlow and IPFIX.  I just had to have my picture taken with him.  Luca is on the right in the photo below:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/lucaDeriNprobe.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1861" title="Luca Deri nProbe" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/lucaDeriNprobe.jpg" alt="Luca Deri nProbe" width="464" height="567" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-1860"></span>Luca and I talked about the <a title="nBox:  nProbe embedded hardware" href="http://www.ravica.com/products/netflow-probe/nbox.php" target="_blank">nBox</a> and its ability to export nearly 500,000 flows per second.  If you accompany the nBox with Scrutinizer <a title="NetFlow collector from Plixer International" href="http://www.plixer.com/products/netflow-sflow/netflow-probe.php" target="_blank">NetFlow Analyzer</a> to report on the IPFIX exports, you end up with an incredibly powerful reporting combination which includes reports on application latency as well as HTTP URLs.</p>
<p>The nBox NetFlow probe is usually configured to reside off of a spanned or mirrored port of a switch.  It receives the packets, creates flows, and exports them to the NetFlow or IPFIX collector.  It is exciting to be involved with this product, and Ravica is the largest nBox distributor of this NetFlow appliance in the USA and Canada.</p>
<p>For more information, please contact us.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/cisco-live-london-with-nprobe-developer-luca-deri/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latency using NetFlow from the nProbe- Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/latency-using-netflow-from-the-nprobe-part-2-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/latency-using-netflow-from-the-nprobe-part-2-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NetFlow probes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nProbe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravica.com/blog/?p=1608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we discussed in our recent blog about the benefits of using a NetFlow probe, the nProbe is an open source network software application developed by Luca Deri which allows admins to get latency from flows on networks.  Through Luca&#8217;s partnership with Plixer International, Plixer has also been offering insight on how to get latency [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we discussed in our recent blog about the benefits of using a <a title="Get latency data from the nProbe." href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/general/latency-using-netflow-from-the-nprobe-part-1/" target="_blank">NetFlow probe</a>, the nProbe is an open source network software application developed by Luca Deri which allows admins to get latency from flows on networks.  Through Luca&#8217;s partnership with Plixer International, Plixer has also been offering insight on how to <a title="Scrutinizer network management software" href="http://www.plixer.com/blog/network-traffic-analysis/how-to-configure-nprobe-to-export-urls-and-latency-via-netflow/" target="_blank">get latency from network flows</a> through their collector called Scrutinizer NetFlow Analyzer.</p>
<p>Latency from the nProbe comes in the following formats:</p>
<p>·       APPL_LATENCY  (Application Latency)<br />
·       CLIENT_NW_DELAY  (Client Network Delay)<br />
·       SERVER_NW_DELAY  (Server Network Delay)</p>
<p>Application Latency and Client Network Delay are determined when the NetFlow probe observes the TCP flags in a transaction.  Below we captured the TCP packets in a connection initiated by client (10.1.15.20) to web server (10.1.7.18).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Image.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1616" title="TCP packets in a connection " src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Image-300x184.jpg" alt="TCP packets in a connection " width="300" height="184" /></a><span id="more-1608"></span></p>
<p>Here is a simplified look at the above 3 packet transaction:</p>
<p><strong>TIME STAMP                                                PORTS                       TCP FLAGS</strong></p>
<p>[pkt  1] 16:12:29.013422                     52525 -&gt; 80                         <ins datetime="2010-04-20T22:37" cite="mailto:Luca%20Deri"> </ins>SYN<br />
[pkt  2] 16:12:29.013923                     52525 &lt;- 80                        SYN/ACK<br />
[pkt  3] 16:12:29.013945                     52525 -&gt; 80                        <ins datetime="2010-04-20T22:37" cite="mailto:Luca%20Deri"></ins>ACK</p>
<p><ins datetime="2010-04-20T22:37" cite="mailto:Luca%20Deri"> </ins></p>
<p><ins datetime="2010-04-20T22:37" cite="mailto:Luca%20Deri"> </ins></p>
<p>Notice the time stamps in the flows above.  We used them to calculate latency below:</p>
<p>Client Network Delay = (16:12:29.013923 &#8211; 16:12:29.013422) / 2 = 0.501 msec / 2 = 0.25 msec<br />
Server Network Delay = (16:12: 29.013945 &#8211; 16:12:29.013923) / 2 = 0.022 msec / 2 = 0.01msec</p>
<p>Above, we divided the time delta by two because we wanted to compute the network latency that we assume is half the round trip time.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Image-2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1624" title="Client and Server Network Delay" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Image-2.jpg" alt="Client and Server Network Delay" width="193" height="212" /></a></p>
<p>Loaded with the above information, the nProbe exports the above millisecond values (.25 msec and .01 msec) as seconds and microseconds.  The seconds column is often rounded off to zero.  Below the values are displayed as collected by FlowView in Scrutinizer in a CSV export:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image-3.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1625" title="Server Network Delay" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image-3-300x48.jpg" alt="Server Network Delay" width="300" height="48" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image-4.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1626" title="Client Network Delay" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image-4-300x46.jpg" alt="Client Network Delay" width="300" height="46" /></a></p>
<p>Notice above that the ACK and PSH flags are not seen because we only saved the packets relevant to our current topic.  The other packets that included the ACK and PSH flags were filtered out of the saved capture.</p>
<p>NetFlow logically ‘ands’ these flags together when exporting a flow.  The 209 packets involved with the first flow are seen below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image-5.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1635" title="NetFlow packets captured in flows" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image-5-300x60.jpg" alt="NetFlow packets captured in flows" width="300" height="60" /></a></p>
<p>The reason the three flows above weren’t all part of one flow is because we are also exporting the URL (which will be the topic of another blog).  The short answer is that when you specify in the template that you want to see the URL, nProbe has to split HTTP/1.1 connections into various http requests.</p>
<p>Application latency is computed as the time needed by an application to react to a client request.  For TCP connections, application latency is computed on the first packet after three-way-handshake.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image-7.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1641" title="Application Latency" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image-7.jpg" alt="Application Latency" width="193" height="209" /></a><br />
As with network latency, application latency is location dependent.  In theory, application latency is supposed to measure the time depicted in pink in the chart, but in practice it also measures the time depicted in green.  For this reason, latency measurements depend on where the probe is placed.  For accuracy reasons, it should be located as close as possible to the server in order to minimize the green time.  For certain protocols (e.g. ftp file transfer or video-over-ip), application latency cannot be computed because they are one way without client-&gt;server and server-&gt;client communications.</p>
<p>The nProbe has a Command Line Interface (CLI) for setting it up.  To  configure our nProbe to export the data needed for this purpose, we  configured it as follows:</p>
<p>nprobe -n 66.186.184.202:2055 -n 66.186.184.204:2055 -i eth1-t 60 -d  15 -u 3 -Q 4 -L 24.39.1.172/32 -r -V 9 -T&#8221;%IPV4_SRC_ADDR  %IPV4_DST_ADDR  %IPV4_NEXT_HOP %INPUT_SNMP %OUTPUT_SNMP %IN_PKTS  %IN_BYTES  %FIRST_SWITCHED %LAST_SWITCHED %L4_DST_PORT %L4_SRC_PORT  %TCP_FLAGS  %PROTOCOL %HTTP_URL%SRC_TOS %SRC_MASK %DST_MASK %CLIENT_NW_DELAY_SEC   %CLIENT_NW_DELAY_USEC %SERVER_NW_DELAY_SEC %SERVER_NW_DELAY_USEC&#8221;</p>
<p>For further details on the open source NetFlow probe, visit Luca Deri&#8217;s <a title="nProbe from NTOP" href="http://www.ntop.org/nProbe.html" target="_blank">NTOP&#8217;s website</a>.  For nProbe pricing, visit our <a title="nProbe pricing with Ravica" href="http://store.ravica.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=39" target="_blank">Online Store</a>.</p>
<p>~Angela<br />
207-324-8173<br />
<a title="Follow Ravica on Twitter!" href="http://twitter.com/RavicaMonitors" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter!</a><br />
<a title="Find us on Facebook!" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#%21/pages/Ravica/127217813987612" target="_blank">Find us on Facebook!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/latency-using-netflow-from-the-nprobe-part-2-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latency using NetFlow from the nProbe- Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/latency-using-netflow-from-the-nprobe-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/latency-using-netflow-from-the-nprobe-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NetFlow probes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nProbe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ravica.com/blog/?p=1652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Determining the causes of application slowness has long been a study of both traffic volume and latency within the transaction.  Administrators had to determine if there was too much traffic on the connection which caused the slowness, or if there was sluggishness caused by the response time of an involved end system.  Perhaps it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Determining the causes of application slowness has long been a study of both traffic volume and latency within the transaction.  Administrators had to determine if there was too much traffic on the connection which caused the slowness, or if there was sluggishness caused by the response time of an involved end system.  Perhaps it was even the application itself causing the slowness.</p>
<p>If you have an nProbe, you can get <a title="What is network latency?" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latency_%28engineering%29" target="_blank">latency from network flows</a> captured by the probe.  <span id="more-1652"></span>The nProbe is an open source NetFlow probe developed by Luca Deri of NTOP.  It resides on a server and turns the traffic it sees into flows.</p>
<p><strong>What is an nProbe?</strong></p>
<p>Most companies that have implemented the nProbe use it for traditional NetFlow v5 information which can be collected and displayed by any NetFlow Analyzer.  However, the nProbe can export dozens of traffic details overlooked by most consumers due to the lack of ability to view the information.  This has changed thanks to Luca’s new formed partnership with <a title="Network Monitoring Software" href="http://www.plixer.com/products/netflow-sflow/scrutinizer-netflow-sflow.php" target="_blank">Plixer International</a>, the developers of Scrutinizer NetFlow and sFlow Analyzer.</p>
<p>Advanced features exported by the nProbe include email addresses, HTTP URLs, Latency and a whole lot more.  One of our favorites to monitor is latency.  Latency from the nProbe comes in the following formats:</p>
<p>·       APPL_LATENCY  (Application Latency)<br />
·       CLIENT_NW_DELAY  (Client Network Delay)<br />
·       SERVER_NW_DELAY  (Server Network Delay)</p>
<p>Below is what the data could look like in Scrutinizer:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image-61.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1664" title="Scrutinizer NetFlow and sFlow Analyzer" src="http://www.ravica.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image-61-300x205.jpg" alt="Scrutinizer NetFlow and sFlow Analyzer" width="300" height="205" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Troubleshooting with Latency</strong></p>
<p>Network delay is crucial for some online services such as SSH and transaction services. Monitoring latency cannot be performed using standard flow templates because latency cannot be estimated using information like bytes/packets and flow duration.</p>
<p>Application latency estimates the time needed by a server to react to a client request which is basically the time that a server needs to answer to client requests.</p>
<p>Both application latency and network delay should be constantly monitored in order to detect slow-downs that degrade the overall service performance.</p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong></p>
<p>The NetFlow probe allows collectors to provide customers with visibility of network performance by providing metrics for estimating the delay introduced by both the network and the server applications.  Location of the nProbe can be important.  Accurate application latency is best gained by locating the nProbe on the actual server of the application or on a probe near the server.</p>
<p>For more details details about the <a title="Ravica Blog Part 2" href="http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/latency-using-netflow-from-the-nprobe-part-2-2/" target="_blank">NetFlow probe functionality</a>, you can read Part 2 of this blog.</p>
<p>Feel free to check out <a title="nProbe from NTOP" href="http://www.ntop.org/nProbe.html" target="_blank">NTOP&#8217;s website</a> for more information about the nProbe.  For <a title="Ravica Online store" href="http://store.ravica.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=39" target="_blank">nProbe pricing</a>, visit our Online Store.</p>
<p>~Angela<br />
207-324-8173<br />
<a title="Follow Ravica on Twitter!" href="http://twitter.com/RavicaMonitors" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter!</a><br />
<a title="Find us on Facebook!" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#%21/pages/Ravica/127217813987612" target="_blank">Find us on Facebook!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ravica.com/blog/netflow-probes/latency-using-netflow-from-the-nprobe-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

